Archives
Recent Articles
- Review: nVIDIA 3D Vision Surround - Part 9

- Review: nVIDIA 3D Vision Surround - Part 8

- Review: nVIDIA 3D Vision Surround - Part 7

- Review: nVIDIA 3D Vision Surround - Part 6

- Review: nVIDIA 3D Vision Surround - Part 5

- Review: nVIDIA 3D Vision Surround - Part 4

- Review: nVIDIA 3D Vision Surround - Part 3

- Review: nVIDIA 3D Vision Surround - Part 2

- Review: nVIDIA 3D Vision Surround - Part 1

- nVIDIA GeForce GTX 460: the reference design images

Categories
Links
-
Review: nVidia GeForce 9800M GTX - Part 3
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare
The tests with Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare were done with the same resolution as Crysis, 1024×768, 4x anti-aliasin and all the options set in both normal and medium for the single player missions.
The framerate results are clearly better than the 8800M GTX. There’s also a clear improvement compared to the 9800GT. With a resolution of 1280×1024 and the same level of details, the 9800M GTX is clearly better than the 9800GT. The framerate is kept at a constant average of 40fps
World in Conflict
The real time strategic title World in Conflict has its own integrated benchmark, which made it easier to compare the performances between the 9800 GT and the 9800 GTX. The resolutions used were 1024×768 and 1280×1024 with the settings at medium, high and very high. The GeForce 9800M GTX has clearly been the best card in all resolutions and detail levels, with a 45fps average rate.
Related posts:
Review - EVGA GeForce GTX 285 - Part 9
Review - GainWard Bliss 8800GTX - Part 17
Review - GeForce GTX 480 and 470 with Fermi architecture - Part 12
Review - GeForce GTX 480 and 470 with Fermi architecture - Part 7
Review - Gigabyte GeForce GTX 285 2GB - Parte 8
Review - MSI GeForce 9800 GTX and GX2 - Part 12
Review: nVIDIA 3D Vision Surround - Part 4
Review: nVidia GeForce 9800M GTX - Part 1
Review: nVidia GeForce 9800M GTX - Part 2
Review: nVidia GeForce 9800M GTX - Part 4

